
November’s labor market delivered the sharpest shocks of 2025. A new $100,000 H-1B visa fee stunned employers, daily AI-driven layoffs surpassed 490, and tariffs froze corporate hiring plans. The result: a labor market so contradictory it feels like whiplash — and everyone’s trying to steady their footing.
The month’s employment data landed amid overlapping policy shocks that exposed fundamental tensions in how America sources, develops, and retains talent. Understanding these dynamics isn’t optional anymore — it’s strategic survival.
September’s presidential proclamation introduced the most dramatic shift to employment-based immigration in decades. Effective September 21, 2025, employers must pay $100,000 per worker to bring H-1B employees from abroad — a fee structure that fundamentally reshapes immigration-based hiring strategies.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services called it “an incremental step to reform the H-1B visa program to curb abuses and protect American workers.” But for tech and healthcare employers, it’s more like a seismic shock.
Goldman Sachs researchers note that unemployment among 20-to-30-year-olds in tech-exposed occupations has risen nearly three percentage points since early 2025 — far higher than in other sectors.
This isn’t an anomaly. It’s a realignment. And it’s forcing executives to rethink what “talent mobility” actually means in a high-cost, high-automation economy.
The visa squeeze arrived just as other pressures mounted. The convergence of immigration barriers, automation displacement, and tariff-driven inflation has created a perfect storm for employers trying to plan for 2026.
A March 2025 CFO survey revealed that one in four companies is scaling back hiring and capital spending because of tariffs. Facing 25% duties on critical imports with unpredictable quarterly costs, corporate caution makes brutal sense.
Goldman Sachs found that “protection from Trump’s tariffs will raise manufacturing employment by a bit less than 100k, but higher input costs will create an almost 500k drag.” That’s a net loss of roughly 400,000 jobs once the economic ripples settle.
Meanwhile, federal government employment has fallen by 97,000 positions since its January peak, with another 15,000 cut in August alone. The labor market increasingly resembles a game of musical chairs — only someone keeps removing seats.
Artificial intelligence isn’t looming — it’s here. Based on aggregated 2025 tech-industry layoff data (as of Q3), an estimated 491 Americans lose their jobs to AI automation each day.
Year-to-date, 76,440 positions have been eliminated due to automation. These aren’t hypothetical futures — they’re LinkedIn profiles being updated in real time.
The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 projects that technological change will create jobs equal to 14% of today’s employment (around 170 million globally by 2030). But that long-term promise offers little comfort to workers displaced this quarter.
Here’s where the contradictions become impossible to ignore.
The World Economic Forum also estimates that half of all employees will need reskilling by 2025 as technology adoption accelerates. So who funds that transition?
November’s labor market sends contradictory signals that defy easy interpretation. Policy changes are constraining immigration just as technology eliminates and creates roles at once. Economic uncertainty freezes hiring even as skills shortages intensify.
For employers, strategic workforce planning is no longer optional. Diversifying pipelines, investing in internal mobility, and building flexible staffing models will separate survivors from casualties.
For professionals, the message is equally stark: the WEF projects that 39% of workers’ current skills will be transformed or obsolete by 2030. The question isn’t whether to upskill — it’s what and how fast.
December’s jobs report will reveal the truth: Who’s adapting — and who’s still waiting for clarity.
Because the labor market isn’t broken. It’s being rebuilt in real time.
The question is whether you’re designing the new structure — or becoming collateral damage in the demolition.
To learn more about Sharp Decisions, get in touch with us here. For more insights, follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter, and find job opportunities on our careers page.